Current:Home > reviewsNorth Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place -FinanceMind
North Carolina appeals court upholds ruling that kept Confederate monument in place
View
Date:2025-04-17 14:33:35
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A North Carolina appeals court ruled Tuesday that local leaders who refused calls to remove a Confederate monument from outside a county courthouse acted in a constitutional manner and kept in place the statue at its longtime location in accordance with state law.
The three-judge panel unanimously upheld a trial court judge’s decision to side with Alamance County and its commissioners over the 30 foot (9.1 meter)-tall statue, which features a Confederate infantryman perched at the top. The state NAACP, the Alamance NAACP chapter, and other groups and individuals had sued the county and its leaders in 2021 after the commissioners rejected calls to take the statue down.
Confederate monuments in North Carolina, as elsewhere nationwide, were a frequent focal point for racial inequality protests in the late 2010s, and particularly in 2020 following the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer. North Carolina legislators enacted a law in 2015 that limits when an “object of remembrance” such as a military monument can be relocated.
The lawsuit’s plaintiffs said the county and the commissioners violated the state constitution by exercising discriminatory intent to protect a symbol of white supremacy outside the historic Alamance County Courthouse, thus creating the appearance of racial prejudice there.
In the opinion, Court of Appeals Chief Judge Chris Dillon wrote that the county commissioners lacked authority under the 2015 law to remove the statue. He also said the county manager’s email to commissioners in June 2020, in which he asked them to consider removing the monument out of concern for protesters’ safety, did not qualify for an exception to that law.
“At all times, the Monument Protection Law required the County to leave the Monument in its current place,” Dillon wrote. He added that a provision in the state constitution intended to ensure state courts are open to the public doesn’t prohibit the placement of objects of historical remembrance in and around a courthouse. The courthouse monument was dedicated in 1914.
“Indeed, in many courthouses and other government buildings across our State and nation, there are depictions of historical individuals who held certain views in their time many today would find offensive,” Dillon wrote.
Judges Donna Stroud and Valerie Zachary joined in the opinion.
Even with the 2015 law, Confederate monuments in North Carolina have been taken down in recent years, sometimes through force.
In 2018, protesters tore down a Confederate statue known as “Silent Sam” at the University of North Carolina campus at Chapel Hill. Statues of soldiers from the North Carolina Confederate Monument on the old Capitol grounds in Raleigh came down in June 2020. Gov. Roy Cooper, citing public safety, directed that the remainder of the monument and two others on Capitol grounds be removed.
The state Supreme Court is currently considering litigation stemming from a 2021 decision by the Asheville City Council to dismantle an obelisk honoring Civil War-era Gov. Zebulon Vance.
veryGood! (1426)
Related
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Travis Barker talks past feelings for Kim Kardashian, how Kourtney 'healed' fear of flying
- Hundreds storm airport in Russia in antisemitic riot over arrival of plane from Israel
- Iowa football to oust Brian Ferentz as offensive coordinator after 2023 season
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- 3 Social Security surprises that could cost you in retirement
- Police investigating alleged robbery after Colorado players say jewelry taken at Rose Bowl
- Española man receives 35-year sentence for 5-year-old stepdaughter’s beating death
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Vonage customers to get nearly $100 million in refunds over junk fees
Ranking
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- The UAW says its strike ‘won things no one thought possible’ from automakers. Here’s how it fared
- Stock market rebounds after S&P 500 slides into a correction. What's next for your 401(k)?
- FBI investigating antisemitic threats against Jewish community at Cornell University
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- In the shadow of loss, a mother’s long search for happiness
- AP PHOTOS: 3-day Halloween festival draws huge crowds to Romania’s capital, Bucharest
- Where Southern Charm's Olivia Stands With Taylor Today After Austen Hookup Betrayal
Recommendation
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
Tropical Storm Pilar heads toward El Salvador and is expected to bring heavy rain to Central America
Venezuela’s high court has suspended the opposition’s primary election process, including its result
Boris Johnson’s aide-turned-enemy Dominic Cummings set to testify at UK COVID-19 inquiry
Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
Golden Bachelor’s Sandra Mason Reacts to Criticism Over Missing Daughter’s Wedding for the Show
New York woman claimed her $1 million Powerball ticket the day before it expired
University of Idaho murders: The timeline of events